HOME QUICK SEARCH AUTHORS KEYWORDS HELP BUGS

independent qc

109 papers and 14 presentations; 118 titles.

Back to keywords

Conference × Year × Title × Authors Extras Pages
WUSS 2026 The Agent That Asks the Questions: Autonomous Hypothesis Generation Over CDISC Trial Data with SAS Mehdi Hajmollaahmad Naraghi,
Lida Gharibvand
source 14
PharmaSUG CN 2026 A Practical Framework for Applying Generative AI in Clinical SAS Programming: A Human-in-the-Loop Approach for Chinese Clinical Studies Siyu Yu source 12
PharmaSUG CN 2026 DupChecker: A Python Tool for Detecting Code Duplication in Double Programming in Clinical Trials Xianhua Zeng source 4
PharmaSUG 2026 Eliminating QC Programming Duplication Through Claude AI-Assisted Independent Code Generation: A Practical Framework for Regulatory-Compliant Validation Jaime Yan,
Jason Zhang
source 13
PharmaSUG 2026 It-s a Wonderful Lifecycle: Translating Statistical Programming into Modern Analytics Development Steve Nicholas source 3
PharmaSUG 2026 Optimizing Clinical TFL Review with Python and Power BI: A Reproducible Workflow to Reduce QC Time and Improve Traceability Vijaya Lakshmi Cherakam,
Latha Donapati
source 10
PharmaSUG 2026 Ready for Next Level SDTMs and ADaMs Compliance with End-to-End Processing? Sunil Kumar Gupta,
Tomás Sabat Stofsel
source 6
PHUSE US 2026 Beyond Box-Checking: Five Best Practices for Embedding QC in Modern SCEs Chris McSpiritt source
presentation source
6
PHUSE US 2026 From SAS to R for TLGs: A Case Study on Implementing an 'R-First, SAS-QC' Workflow for Time-to-Event Analysis Adler Moisés Fallas Rodríguez source
presentation source
8
PHUSE US 2026 Optimising Output Review: A Targeted and Scalable RTF Validation Framework Siddharth Kumar source
presentation source
7
PHUSE US 2026 QC Without Code: ChatGPT Enterprise for Sponsor Oversight of Outsourced TFLs Jenny Price,
Brad Moore
source
presentation source
9
PHUSE US 2026 Ready for Next-Level SDTM and ADaM Compliance with End-to-End Processing? Sunil Kumar Gupta source
presentation source
4
PHUSE APAC 2026 An Agentic Approach to Validation, Influencing Reporting with AI Junibel R. De Leon,
Karthik Palani
source
presentation source
5
PHUSE EU 2025 Being a Perfect Programmer: Code Smarter, Review Sharper, and Embrace the Future Akhil Vijayan,
Limna Salim
source
presentation source
11
PHUSE EU 2025 Detecting Logical Errors in Clinical Programming by Applying ChatGPT Illia Skliar source
presentation source
9
PHUSE EU 2025 Lets Not Get Lost in Translation: Open-Source Adoption at Novartis Mark Baillie,
Orla Doyle
source
presentation source
6
PHUSE EU 2025 Modernising Clinical Data Science: Best Practices for a Unified, Governed SCE [presentation] Matthew Tendler source 13
PHUSE EU 2025 Neither Magic Wand Nor Terminator: Finding the Sweet Spot in AI-Assisted Coding Josua Böser source
presentation source
12
PHUSE EU 2025 Twice as Much Aint Twice as Good: Is Double Programming Really the Gold Standard We Think it Is? Vitali Gering source
presentation source
6
PHUSE EU 2025 Why I can't see myself coding that much anymore Angelo Wibbeler source
presentation source
11
PharmaSUG 2025 Achieving Reliable Data Verification with R: Proven Tools, Best Practices, and Innovative Workflows Valeria Duran,
Xuehan (Emily) Zhang
source 15
PharmaSUG 2025 Does SDTM Validation Really Require Double Programming? Sunil Kumar Gupta,
Tomás Sabat Stofsel
source 5
PharmaSUG 2025 Handling Health Regulatory Information Requests: Best Practices and Strategies Himanshu Patel,
Chintan Pandya
source 11
PHUSE US 2025 Efficient TFL Review within Statistical Programming - Using R and SAS Siddharth Kumar source
presentation source
8
PHUSE US 2025 From Specification to CSR -- Toward a Unified Analysis and Review Platform Steve Ross source
presentation source
7
PHUSE US 2025 Validated by Verisian: The Future of Quality Control and Validation in Clinical Trial Analyses Henning Kuich source
presentation source
12
PHUSE US 2025 Verify: A First-in-Class Review and Validation Platform for Biometrics in Clinical Research Achinoam Ravet Perel source
presentation source
3
PHUSE EU 2024 A way out of the PROC COMPARE labyrinth Judith Kanz source
poster source
9
PHUSE EU 2024 Keynote Speaker - Maneesh Juneja [presentation] Maneesh Juneja source 104
PHUSE EU 2024 SCE Alchemy: The Return of the QC Process, and Rise of Training via LLM Steve Griffiths,
Eleanor Sparling
source
presentation source
6
PHUSE EU 2024 Verify: Facilitating End-to-End Automation of Clinical Validation Processes Using AI Algorithms and Dynamic Collaboration Ilan Carmeli source
presentation source
3
WUSS 2024 inspectoR: QC in R? No Problem! Steve Wade,
Sudhir Kedare
source 7
WUSS 2024 Leading with Impact: Building Stronger Programming Teams Through Effective Leadership and Collaboration Menaga Guruswamy Ponnupandy source 6
PharmaSUG 2024 A Practical Approach to Automating SDTM Using a Metadata-Driven Method That Leverages CRF Specifications and SDTM Standards Xiangchen (Bob) Cui,
Min Chen,
Jessie Wang
source 23
PharmaSUG 2024 inspectoR: QC in R? No Problem! Steve Wade,
Sudhir Kedare,
Chen Yang,
Matthew Travell,
Jagan Mohan Achi
source 7
PHUSE US 2024 A Practical Approach to Automating SDTM Using a Metadata-Driven Method that Leverages eCRF Specifications and SDTM Programming Standards Xiangchen (Bob) Cui,
Min Chen
source
presentation source
12
PHUSE US 2024 Eliminating SDTM Double Programming by Using a Validation Tool and Dummy Data Glenn Borgmans,
Tine Seeuws
source
presentation source
8
PHUSE US 2024 How to Monitor SDTM Data Health Amanda Cross source
presentation source
8
PHUSE US 2024 Optimizing Clinical Research: Using AI for Automated Validation of Output Tables against ADaM Steve Ross source
presentation source
5
PHUSE US 2024 Ups, Downs, and FDA Crowns - Lessons Learned from BIMO Submission Adventures! [presentation] Sushant Thakare source 21
PHUSE EU 2023 A Robust Framework to Provide and Validate Real-Time SDTM Data Bremer Louw source
presentation source
11
WUSS 2023 Navigating SAS and CDISC Certification with Apprenticeship Sarvar Khamidov source 7
WUSS 2023 Quality Control - Defining an Acceptable Quality Standard without Achieving Perfection Bill Coar source 9
PharmaSUG 2023 Can We Do It Better? Real-Time Validation Of Sdtm Mapping Is Superior To Double Programming Daniel Rolo,
Bremer Louw
source 9
PharmaSUG 2023 Integrating Practices: How Statistical Programmers Differ and Align Within User Groups Valeria Duran,
Radhika Etikala,
Haimavati Rammohan
source 15
PharmaSUG 2023 Real World Evidence in Distributed Data Networks: Lessons from a Post-Marketing Safety Study Matthew T. Slaughter,
Denis Nyongesa,
John Dickerson,
Jennifer Kuntz
source 7
PHUSE US 2023 A TransCelerate Initiative: Paving the Way for the Adoption of Modernized Statistical Analytics [presentation] Nicholas Masel source 12
PHUSE US 2023 Cybernated Validation of Clinical Reports (TLs) Giri Balasubramanian,
Gopinath Viswanathan
source 9
PHUSE EU 2022 R Shiny Apps: To QC or Not to QC? [presentation] Katie Withycombe source
video
19
PharmaSUG 2022 The Emerging Use of Automation to Address the Challenge of Cross-Table Consistency Checking of Output Used in the Reporting of Clinical Trial Data Ilan Carmeli,
Keren Mayorov,
Hugh Donovan
source 6
PHUSE US 2022 R Got This! Delivering a Complete Statistical Package Using R [presentation] Alice Ehmann,
Michael S Rimler
source
video
10
PHUSE EU 2021 New Starters Session: The Secret Sauce to Start in Our Industry [presentation] Amritpal Singh,
Lucie Bowden
source 7
PHUSE US 2021 Data Science Presentations: DSc01: How Automation Using Machine Learning Technology Can Overcome the Limitations of Double Programming [presentation] Hugh Donovan,
Ilan Carmeli
source 18
PHUSE US 2021 Visual Programming for ADaM Derivation [presentation] Clara Beck,
Robert Adams
source
video
33
PharmaSUG 2021 A Process to Validate Internal Developed R Package under Regulatory Environment Madhusudhan Ginnaram,
Amin Shirazi,
Simiao Ye,
Yalin Zhu,
Yilong Zhang
source 7
PharmaSUG 2021 Bookdown and Blogdown: Using R packages to document and communicate new processes to Clinical Programming Benjamin Straub source 11
PharmaSUG 2021 Only Get What You Need - To Simplify Analysis Data Validation Report from PROC COMPARE Output Wenjun He source 12
PHUSE EU 2020 Leading Innovation and Change via Olympic Goals [presentation] Robin Koeger,
Ross Farrugia
source
video
14
PharmaSUG 2020 Ensuring Consistency Across CDISC Dataset Programming Processes Jennifer K. Fulton source 10
PHUSE US 2020 Documentation, Applicability and Automation: How Best Practices Can Help You Achieve Best Results Aadesh Shah source
presentation source
7
PHUSE US 2020 R Package Oriented Software Development Life Cycle in Regulated Clinical Trial Environments Rinki Jajoo,
Yalin Zhu
source
presentation source
12
PHUSE US 2020 Tables, Figures & Listings Metadata and Traceability Judith Goud,
Stephen Castellano
source
presentation source
9
PHUSE EU 2019 Don't cha wish your tracker was clean like mine? Anisa Jeetoo source
presentation source
8
PHUSE EU 2019 How Metadata Can Help Drive the Creation of Tables, Figures and Listings Judith Goud,
Stephen Castellano
source
presentation source
9
PHUSE EU 2019 Quality Control and Validation - More Than Just PROC COMPARE Evgeny Starostin source
poster source
7
PharmaSUG 2019 An Innovative Efficacy Table Programming to Automate Its Figure Generation to Ensure Both High Quality and Efficiency Xiangchen (Bob) Cui,
Letan (Cleo) Lin
source 23
PharmaSUG 2019 Begin with the End of Validation: Adapting QbD Approach in Statistical Programming to Achieve Quality and Compliance Excellence Linghui Zhang source 8
PharmaSUG 2019 Integrating programming workflow into computing environments: A closer look Tyagrajan Swaminathan,
Sridhar Vijendra
source 11
PHUSE US 2019 Fitting Programming Processes into Workflows on Systems - Is the Square Peg in a Round Hole? Sridhar Vijendra,
Tyagrajan Swaminathan
source
presentation source
10
PHUSE US 2019 Metadata-driven Automation in Drug Research Hanming Tu,
Zhongping Lin
source
presentation source
13
PHUSE US 2019 Remotely Manage Your Team's Time and Tasks Efficiently Vara Prasad Reddy Sakampally source
presentation source
5
SCSUG 2018 Automated Validation of Complex Clinical Trials Made Easy Richann J. Watson source 35
PHUSE EU 2018 Access Rights Management and Version Control in an Independent Programming Environment Christian Sachara,
Anke Grohl
source
presentation source
6
PHUSE EU 2018 Program Validation - Care for a Black Sheep Andrea Weber source
poster source
8
PHUSE US 2018 Cue the Word - QC - All You Need to Know! Subha Jamburajan,
Nancy Haeusser
source
presentation source
6
PHUSE US 2018 Upholding Ethics and Integrity: A macro-based approach to detect plagiarism in programming Sridhar Vijendra,
Praveen Kumar
source
presentation source
7
PharmaSUG 2018 A Linux shell script to automatically compare results of statistical analyses Chen Wang,
Shu Zan,
Joshua Conrad
source 9
PharmaSUG 2018 Automated Validation of Complex Clinical Trials Made Easy Richann J. Watson,
Joshua M. Horstman
source 35
PharmaSUG 2018 Risk-based Validation in Clinical Trial Reporting: Focus on What Matters Most Amber Randall,
William Coar
source 10
SESUG 2017 Automated Validation of Complex Clinical Trials Made Easy Richann J. Watson source 35
PHUSE EU 2017 Streamline SDTM Development and QC Stephen Gormley source
presentation source
9
MWSUG 2017 Automated Validation of Complex Clinical Trials Made Easy Richann J. Watson,
Joshua M. Horstman
35
WUSS 2017 Automated Validation of Complex Clinical Trials Made Easy Richann J. Watson,
Joshua M. Horstman
source 34
PharmaSUG 2017 Data Integrity: One step before SDTM Pavan Kathula,
Sonal Torawane
source 9
PharmaSUG 2017 Data Monitoring Committee Report Programming: Considering a Risk-Based Approach to Quality Control Amber Randall,
Bill Coar
source 9
SGF 2017 Quality Control Programming: A Lost Art? Amber Randall,
Bill Coar
source 15
SESUG 2016 Are You Sure That Is Correct?: An Overview Of Good Practices For Dataset And Output Validation Gregory Weller source 8
PHUSE EU 2016 Fast and High-quality Validation Process Andrea Parodi,
Dimitri Petratchenko
source
presentation source
7
PHUSE EU 2016 The Data Detective: Hints and Tips for Independent Programming QC Bethan Thomas source 11
PHUSE EU 2016 What Auditors Want Angelo Tinazzi,
Cédric Marchand
source
presentation source
8
PharmaSUG 2016 SDTM Automation with Standard CRF Pages Taylor Markway source 10
PHUSE EU 2015 Independent Double Programming - Are We Doing the Right Thing? [presentation] Beate Hientszch source 1
PHUSE EU 2015 The Rewarding (and Rocky) Road from SAS Applications Programmer to SAS Software Developer Jeffrey M. Abolafia,
Carrie Dundas-Lucca
source
presentation source
8
PHUSE EU 2014 Frequency Tables - Aspects to Consider Katja Glass source
presentation source
10
PharmaSUG 2014 Evaluating the benefits of JMP for SAS programmers Xiaopeng Li,
Chun Feng,
Nancy Wang
source 9
PharmaSUG 2014 Process and Tools for Assessing Compliance with Standard Operating Procedures Ginger Redner,
Eunice Ndungu
source 10
PharmaSUG 2014 Validating Analysis Data Set without Double Programming - An Alternative Way to Validate the Analysis Data Set Linfeng Xu,
Christina Scienski
source 15
NESUG 2013 Using SAS Metadata as a Key Performance Indicator! Vincent J. Amoruccio 11
PharmaSUG 2013 A Simple Approach to the Automated Unit Testing of Clinical SAS Macros Matthew Nizol source 12
PharmaSUG 2013 LST in Comparison Sanket Kale,
Sajin Johnny
source 11
PharmaSUG 2013 Using Workflows and Metadata Information to Standardize Business Processes in Pharmaceutical Programming Peng Yang,
Wei Liu,
Julie A. Maddox
source 9
PHUSE EU 2012 Bootstrap Analysis Double-Independent Programming: Issues and Solutions Nils Penard source
presentation source
10
PHUSE EU 2012 The Logic of a Programmer - A Case Study Julie Oates source
presentation source
7
PHUSE EU 2012 Validation in Epidemiological Studies [presentation] Raimund Storb source 24
PharmaSUG CN 2012 Rising to Excellence - How a China CRO Achieves International Standards [presentation] Helen Yin,
Minzhi Liu
27
PharmaSUG 2012 Automation of Comparing ODS RTF Outputs in Batch using VBA and SAS Dongsun Cao source 8
PharmaSUG 2012 Making a List, Checking it Twice: Efficient Production and Verification of Tables and Figures Using SAS Linda Collins,
Elizabeth Li
source 17
PharmaSUG 2011 Beyond Double Programming - SAS Programming By Design (PBD) with Soop Laiju Zhang source 4
PharmaSUG 2011 Making a List, Checking it Twice (Part 1): Techniques for Specifying and Validating Analysis Datasets Elizabeth Li,
Linda Collins
source 8
PHUSE EU 2010 A Case Study in Using Unit Testing as a Method of Primary Validation Ross Farrugia source
presentation source
12
PHUSE EU 2010 Back to the future Kristiina Puustusmaa source
poster source
4
PHUSE EU 2010 Challenges of Clinical projects shared between Pharma Companies [presentation] Oliver LeConte source 27
PHUSE EU 2010 Validation Strategies for Report Objects and Programs - Challenges and Obstacles in a Risk Based World Christoph Ziegler,
Beate Hientzsch
source
presentation source
12
MWSUG 2010 Comparing JMP and SAS for Validating Clinical Trials Sandra D. Schlotzhauer 18
PharmaSUG 2010 Programming Validation: Perspectives and Strategies Parag Shiralkar 4
SGF 2010 Establishing Consistent Programming for Pharmaceutical Safety Summarizations Using a DOW Loop Bradford J. Danner,
Steven R. Kirby
source 8
PHUSE EU 2009 Getting Your Point Across - Efficiency in QC Programming across Virtual Teams James Bidwell source 4
PharmaSUG 2009 Establishing Consistent Programming for Pharmaceutical Safety Summarizations Using a DOW Loop Bradford J. Danner,
Steven R. Kirby
8
PHUSE EU 2006 Why Safety Reporting IS like Rocket Science David J. Garbutt source 3
WUSS 2006 Have It Both Ways: Macros that Produce Publication-Quality Tables and Stand-alone Code Linda Collins,
Lisa Kaye Brooks,
Michael Rea,
Alan Hopkins
source 19
SCSUG 2004 Just for the Kids School Reports: A data-oriented web site powered by SAS Bob Zambarano 14
SCSUG 1994 Your Map to the Sea of GUIs: A Primer on Moving SAS Applications Across Graphical Operating Systems James D. Hefner 7
SUGI 1994 This is a Fairy TaleNOT! A Primer on Moving SAS Applications Across Graphical Operating Systems James D. Hefner source 6

Back to keywords