HOME QUICK SEARCH AUTHORS KEYWORDS HELP BUGS

interim analysis

74 papers and 7 presentations; 77 titles.

Back to keywords

Conference × Year × Title × Authors Extras Pages
PharmaSUG 2026 Managing Unblinded Activities Internally: The Independent Statistical Analysis Team (iSAT) Model Hong Wang,
Shu Chen,
Chen Li
source 4
PharmaSUG 2026 Perspectives on Leading Effectively in Platform Trials: Leadership and Technical Approaches Zhen (Laura) Li source 7
PHUSE US 2026 Blind/Unblind Workflows: Secure Separation and Governance in the CDR SCE Kala Shivali,
Sachin Walawalkar
source
presentation source
11
PHUSE US 2026 From Data Cutoffs to Decision-Making: Programming Futility Analysis in Oncology Clinical Trials Mani Mudumba source
presentation source
6
PHUSE US 2026 Optimising Flexibility and Consistency in Statistical Programming for Platform Trials: Practical Approaches to Data Cut, SDTM, ADaM and TFL Setup Kelly Fang,
Zhen (Laura) Li
source
poster source
6
PHUSE APAC 2026 From Listings to Leadership: Navigating 18 Years of Statistical Programming Outsourcing and the Road Ahead Girish Havildar source
presentation source
7
PHUSE EU 2025 Blinded & Coordinated: Aligning People and Processes To Prevent Unblinding Monika Bajek,
Dubravka Georgijevic
source
presentation source
6
PHUSE EU 2025 Oh Dear, Another Crisis? A Programmers Guide to Surviving and Thriving Through the FDA ODAC Zach Dorman source
presentation source
12
PHUSE EU 2025 On the Right Track: Managing Platform Modular Studies with a Central Metadata Switchboard Dubravka Georgijevic,
Carla Santillán
source
presentation source
7
PHUSE EU 2025 Roadmap to an ODAC: The Journey to and Through an FDA Oncologic Drug Advisory Committee as a Study Lead Programmer Charles Wright source
poster source
2
PHUSE EU 2025 Showcasing a Shiny Tool for Evaluating Biomarkers for Derisking Clinical Trials Stefan Thoma source
presentation source
9
PharmaSUG 2025 Promising Zone Designs for Sample Size Re-estimation in Clinical Trials: Graphical Approaches Using SAS Zhao Yang,
Shivani Nanda
source 18
PHUSE US 2025 Fit for Purpose: How to Prepare a Package for Efficient Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) Data Review Ke Xiao,
Hong Wang
source
poster source
4
PHUSE EU 2024 Failed Clinical Trials: How to Benefit From Negative Experience Anna Amosova source
presentation source
13
PharmaSUG 2023 Programmer-s Perspective: Step into Awareness Regarding Clinical Trial Deliverables and Their Impact Lyma Faroz,
Jinit Mistry
source 10
PharmaSUG 2023 Shifting the drug development paradigm with Adaptive Design and master protocol Aman Bahl source 16
PharmaSUG 2023 Study Data Technical Rejection Criteria (TRC) Considerations for Multiple Data Packages in a Single Submission Christine S Teng,
Janet Low,
Si Ru Tang
source 10
PHUSE US 2023 Handling Multiple Adaptations in One Clinical Trial Parvee Kumar,
Shrutimita Pokhariyal
source
presentation source
6
PHUSE EU 2022 Adaptive Design - Better Bend Than Break [presentation] Albin John,
Athira Sudhakar
source 15
PHUSE US 2022 Statistical Programming Operational Review Dashboard [presentation] Kathleen J. Harkins,
Shuqi Zhao
source
video
16
PHUSE EU 2021 Navigating the Evolving Regulations for Health Canada [presentation] Gina Bennet source
video
20
PHUSE EU 2020 A Programmer's Journey Through an Early Oncology Adaptive Platform Trial [presentation] Rafi Rahi source
video
20
PHUSE EU 2020 Data Collection Time Point - Challenges with Analysis and Submission [presentation] Aayush Bhoraskar,
Sanket Kalyankar
source
video
11
SGF 2020 Bayesian Sequential Monitoring of Clinical Trials Using SAS Matthew A. Psioda source 13
PharmaSUG 2020 Metadata-driven Modular Macro Design for SDTM and ADaM Ellen (Zihui) Lin,
Aditya Tella,
Yeshashwini Chenna,
Michael Hagendoorn
source 9
PHUSE US 2020 Sample Size Re-estimation in Action: Design Consideration, Charter Development and Implementation [poster] Adam Hamm source 1
PharmaSUG 2019 Practical Perspective in Sample Size Determination Bill Coar source 16
PharmaSUG 2019 Raw data sets tracker: Time and project management based on the volume of available clinical data using SAS software Girish Kankipati source 10
PHUSE EU 2018 First Aid Kit for an Observational Study Yuliia Bahatska,
Vladlen Ivanushkin
source
poster source
4
PHUSE EU 2018 Handling CRF Design Changes in a Live Environment Andre Snelting,
Nieke De Ruiter
source
presentation source
10
PHUSE EU 2018 Implementation of Data Cut Off in Analysis of Clinical Trials Ann Croft source
presentation source
13
MWSUG 2018 Avoiding Sinkholes: Common Mistakes During ADaM Data Set Implementation Richann J. Watson 15
PHUSE US 2018 Adverse Event Analysis - One step forward! Anuja Rasal source
presentation source
11
PHUSE US 2018 Don't Sweat It! Consider Taking the Risk Out of your Outsourced Deliverables Jennifer True,
Nancy Haeusser
source
presentation source
4
PHUSE US 2018 Interim Survival Analysis Across 3 Platforms Venita DePuy source
presentation source
22
PharmaSUG 2018 ADINTDT and ADTTE for Survival Sweep in Oncology Studies Christine S Teng,
Wenyu Hu
source 6
PharmaSUG 2018 Avoiding Sinkholes: Common Mistakes During ADaM Data Set Implementation Richann J. Watson,
Karl Miller
source 18
PharmaSUG 2018 Implementation of Data Cut Off in Analysis of Clinical Trials Mei Dey source 15
PHUSE EU 2017 Futile or Not? An Interim Analysis Case Study Ingrid Franklin source
presentation source
9
WUSS 2017 Avoiding Sinkholes: Common Mistakes During ADaM Data Set Implementation Richann J. Watson,
Karl Miller
source 15
PharmaSUG 2017 SAS Macro for Derivation of Best Overall Response per RECIST v. 1.1 Bob Zhong,
Jiangfan Li,
Hong Xie,
Peter De Porre,
Kenneth Maahs,
Kyounghwa Bae
source 9
PharmaSUG 2017 Visualizing Enrollment Over Time Laura Gruetzner source 11
SESUG 2016 Surviving the Interim: Insights Into Interim Survival Analyses Venita DePuy source 31
PHUSE EU 2016 EnForeSys - An Advanced Patient Enrolment Forecaster with Monte Carlo Simulations Ritika Yadav,
Swechhya Bista
source
presentation source
12
PHUSE EU 2016 Multiplicity Issues in Clinical Trials - Look at it with a Magnifying Glass! Madhusudhan Bandi source
presentation source
6
MWSUG 2016 Frequentist and Bayesian Interim Analysis in Clinical Trials: Group Sequential Testing and Posterior Predictive Probability Monitoring Using SAS Kechen Zhao 14
PharmaSUG 2016 Deconstructing ADRS: Tumor Response Analysis Data Set Steve Almond source 11
PharmaSUG 2016 Handling Interim and Incomplete Data in a Clinical Trials Setting Paul Stutzman source 13
PharmaSUG 2016 Strategic Considerations for CDISC Implementation Amber Randall,
William Coar
source 6
PHUSE EU 2015 Constructing a Simple Data Repository [presentation] Magnus Mengelbier source 19
PHUSE EU 2015 The Highs, Lows and Lessons of a First-Time Study Lead Bethan Thomas source
presentation source
7
PharmaSUG CN 2015 Why Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) should be comprehensive. Riddhi Merchant,
Ranjith Prayankotveettil
6
PHUSE EU 2014 Data Challenges in Adaptive Trials Claudio Garutti source
presentation source
5
PHUSE EU 2014 PROC EASTMONITOR - A SAS Add-on for Monitoring Adaptive Clinical Trials Sheetal Solanki,
Ajay Sathe
source
presentation source
15
PHUSE EU 2013 Complex Randomisations Need Not Be Complex Fiona Brock source
presentation source
4
PHUSE EU 2013 Organising Deliverables for Clinical Trials - The Concept of Analyses and its Implementation in EXACT Hansjörg Frenzel source
presentation source
6
PharmaSUG 2013 SAS Programmer to Clinical SAS Programmer Gayatri Karkera,
Nehan Mohan
source 7
PHUSE EU 2012 East6: Software for Designing, Simulating and Monitoring Group Sequential Trials Hrishikesh Kulkarni,
Sheetal Solanki
source
presentation source
12
PHUSE EU 2012 Pooling Clinical Data: Key Points and Pitfalls Florence Buchheitt source
presentation source
8
PHUSE EU 2012 Training Statistical Programmers on SAP Review Skills Sascha Ahrweiler source
presentation source
7
PharmaSUG CN 2012 Methods to Generate Unavailable Categories in Interim Analysis Xiaoran Yin 6
PHUSE EU 2011 Access Control Execution Systems (ACES) Shailesh Kulthe,
Eric Silva
source 10
PHUSE EU 2011 Architect - A Platform for Design and Analysis Software for Clinical Trials Shashank Maratkar source 12
PHUSE EU 2011 Training Statistical Programmers on SAP Review Skills Sascha Ahrweiler source
presentation source
7
SCSUG 2010 Impact of model mis-specification on conditional power in interim survival analysis Chao L. Chen source 9
PHUSE EU 2009 Clinical Database acceptance: what statistical review checks are necessary to validate a database? Genevieve Jehl source 12
PHUSE EU 2009 Medical Research: What should Programmers prepare for? Emilie Brennion source 12
PHUSE EU 2009 The role of the statistician in data monitoring committees Fritz Schindel source 28
PharmaSUG 2008 Managing Operational Challenges for Interim Analyses Mei Dey 10
PharmaSUG 2007 Designing and Building an Administrative Model for SAS Drug Development Margaret M. Coughlin 6
NESUG 2006 Designing and Building an Administrative Model for the SAS Drug Development Tool Meg Coughlin 6
PharmaSUG 2006 SAS Drug Development: Bringing Innovation to Life Sciences David Handelsman 12
SUGI 2006 Version Control on the Cheap. A User-Friendly, Cost-Effective Revision Control System for SAS Tim P. Williams source 10
PharmaSUG 2004 Version Control on the Cheap. A User-Friendly, Cost-Effective Revision Control System for SAS Tim P. Williams 11
PharmaSUG 2003 Sneak Peek: Previewing Blinded Study Results Amy Rhoads Underwood 4
VIEWS 2001 SAS/AF Application in Sequential Clinical Trials Tatsuru Matsushita 5
WUSS 2000 Taking Control and Keeping It: Creating and Using Conditionally Executable SAS Code Justina M. Flavin,
Arthur L. Carpenter
source 4
PharmaSUG 2000 Taking Control and Keeping It: Creating and Using Conditionally Executable SAS Code Justina M. Flavin 4
SUGI 2000 Taking Control and Keeping It: Creating and Using Conditionally Executable SAS Code Justina M. Flavin,
Arthur L. Carpenter
source 4
WUSS 1993 A SAS Program for Sample Size Determination for Equivalence Trials Akiko Tomita,
Chul W. Ahn,
Joyce C. Niland
source 6
SUGI 1982 Interim Error Handling Strategies in a SAS Based Research Data Management System David H. Christiansen,
James D. Hosking
source 6

Back to keywords