HOME QUICK SEARCH AUTHORS KEYWORDS HELP BUGS

complete response

38 papers and 2 presentations; 38 titles.

Back to keywords

Conference × Year × Title × Authors Extras Pages
PharmaSUG 2026 Swimmer Plots - Some Practical Advice Ilya Krivelevich source 11
PHUSE EU 2025 Visualising the Invisible: Patient Journey with Waterfall, Spider and Swimmer Plots Varsha Mithun Patil,
Sunita Poojary
source
presentation source
14
SESUG 2025 Building Complex Graphics from Simple Plot Types Dan Heath 17
PharmaSUG 2025 Integrated R scripts to Power BI Jun Yang source 6
PharmaSUG 2025 Visualizing oncology data through 3D bar charts in R and Python Girish Kankipati,
Venkatesulu Salla
source 18
PharmaSUG 2024 Building Complex Graphics from Simple Plot Types Dan Heath source 17
PHUSE EU 2023 Efficacy Endpoints in Adjuvant and Neo-Adjuvant Oncology Trials Yuliia (Piddubna) Cherednichenko,
Anna Amosova
source
presentation source
15
PharmaSUG 2022 Derivation of Efficacy Endpoints by iRECIST Criteria: A Practical Approach Ilya Krivelevich,
Lei Gao,
Richard Kennan
source 9
PHUSE US 2021 Waffle Chart in SAS Abhinav Srivastva source
video
presentation source
4
PharmaSUG 2020 Butterfly Plot for Comparing Two Treatment Responses Raghava Pamulapati source 13
PharmaSUG 2020 CDISC-compliant Implementation of iRECIST and LYRIC for Immunomodulatory Therapy Trials Kuldeep Sen,
Sumida Urval,
Yang Wang
source 11
PharmaSUG 2020 Simplifying the Derivation of Best Overall Response per RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST in Solid Tumor Clinical Studies Xiangchen (Bob) Cui,
Sri Pavan Vemuri
source 24
PharmaSUG 2019 Jump Start your Oncology knowledge Xiaoyin Zhong,
Feng Liu
source 9
PHUSE US 2019 Efficacy Endpoint Visualization of Investigational Products for Cancer Patients Using R Shiny Beverly Martinez,
Mukul K Mittal
source
presentation source
12
PHUSE EU 2018 Step-by-step Guide to Efficacy Analysis in Solid Tumors Oncology Clinical Trials Anastasiia Tiurdo source
presentation source
11
PHUSE EU 2018 The Oncology-specific Domains TU, TS and RS: What to Know as a Statistical Analyst Frieder Wolff,
Vitali Gering
source
presentation source
8
SESUG 2018 Are You Ready for It? Preparing for Your Next Technical Interview Christine McNichol source 6
PharmaSUG 2018 Analysis of Oncology Studies for Programmers and Statisticians Kevin Lee source 7
PharmaSUG 2018 Are You Ready for It? Preparing for Your Next Technical Interview Christine McNichol source 6
PharmaSUG 2018 Derivations of Response Status from SDTM Domains using RECIST 1.1 Christine S Teng,
Lei Pang
source 10
PharmaSUG 2018 Know your PET: From the Scans to SDTM Datasets Balavenkata Pitchuka,
Bhargav Koduru
source 8
PharmaSUG 2017 Programming LYRIC Response in Immunomodulatory Therapy Trials Yang Wang source 5
PharmaSUG 2017 SAS Macro for Derivation of Best Overall Response per RECIST v. 1.1 Bob Zhong,
Jiangfan Li,
Hong Xie,
Peter De Porre,
Kenneth Maahs,
Kyounghwa Bae
source 9
PHUSE EU 2016 Integrating the New EMA Requirements on Public Disclosure in the Study Conduct [presentation] Jean-Marc Ferran source 20
WUSS 2016 Why and What Standards for Oncology Studies (Solid Tumor, Lymphoma and Leukemia)? Kevin Lee source 7
PharmaSUG 2016 Swimmer Plot by Graphic Template Language (GTL) Baiming Wang source 9
PharmaSUG 2015 Two different use cases to obtain best responses using RECIST 1.1: SDTM and ADaM Kevin Lee,
Vikash Jain
source 17
PHUSE EU 2014 Oncology Efficacy Endpoints Sarah Berenbrick source
presentation source
3
PharmaSUG 2014 Swimmer Plot: Tell a Graphical Story of Your Time to Response Data Using PROC SGPLOT Stacey D. Phillips source 12
PHUSE EU 2012 Risk-Benefit Analysis for Oncology Clinical Trials Lovemore Gakava,
Waseem Jugon
source
poster source
8
PharmaSUG 2012 Calculating time-to-event parameters using a single DATA step and a RETAIN statement Andrew L Hulme source 7
PharmaSUG 2012 Tumor Assessment using RECIST: Behind the Scenes Suhas R. Sanjee,
Rajavel Ganesan,
Mary N. Varughese
source 7
PharmaSUG 2012 Waterfall Charts in Oncology Trials - Ride the Wave Niraj J. Pandya source 8
NESUG 2011 Waterfall Charts: Play the Mario with Your Data Niraj J. Pandya,
Sapan Raval
7
PHUSE EU 2009 Building and maintaining a clinical data warehouse - challenges and opportunities for pharmaceutical programmers [presentation] Juergen Kuebler source 15
PharmaSUG 2009 Are you computing Confidence Interval for binomial proportion using PROC FREQ? Be Careful!! Sandeep Sawant 6
SESUG 2001 A SAS Approach to WEB-Based Surveys Bernard R. Poisson source 9
SCSUG 2001 A SAS-Based Approach to WEB-Based Surveys Bernard R. Poisson 9
SUGI 1996 Creating Winning Graphs Deb Cassidy,
Lori D. Griffin
source 9
SUGI 1995 DrugA v.s. Comparator % Complete Response by Dose Lori D. Griffin source 20

Back to keywords